a. Facts-
P is an internet provider and D is an internet marketing agency. D uses P’s
systems to send unsolicited “spam” email. P claims that, by doing so, it negatively
affects P’s systems. P told D to stop; D did not stop. P sued D for trespass to
chattel.
b. Procedural
History- Ct granted the request for a preliminary injunction, finding that P
was likely to succeed on the merits.
c. Issue-
Whether email/system use is an actionable subject matter for trespass to
chattel
d. Holding-
Yes, emails/system use can be the subject matter for actions of trespass to
chattel
e. Rule-
Physical dispossession is not necessary for a suit of trespass to chattel, so
long as damage is present
f. Rationale-
Physical damage is not necessary for a suit of trespass to chattel. By using
P’s computer systems, D devalued (damaged) the system.
No comments:
Post a Comment